All Courses
Upcoming Course Dates
Professional Courses
Academy & Short Courses
IPM Courses
PMI Courses
IPMA Courses
PRINCE2 Courses
Corporate Training
Corporate Partnership
Strategic Partnership
IPM Competency Pathway
Growth Partner
Certification Overview
IPMA Certification
PMI Certification
About IPM Hub
IPM Membership
EMEA Monthly Events
Mentorship
All Resources
Expert Insights
Ebooks & Toolkits
Publish Your Writing
IPM Jobs Portal
The Institute
Faculty
Global Advisory Board
Apply to Lecture or Volunteer
Apply to Intern or Campus Ambassador
Speak to an Advisor
hamburger__close
The Faculty of Innovative Technologies of the University of Applied Sciences of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI) level started in January 2022 a study for the evaluation and monitoring of an organisation with respect to the issue of resilience.
The study was based on a structured online google survey sent by email to a selected target.
The target identified are companies located in Switzerland and Italy operating in different sectors, the size of which varies from small, medium and large. The survey includes both local and global organisations and former SUPSI project management graduates are part of this evaluation. Those looking to deepen their understanding of project management practice can explore a range of project management courses that address these evolving challenges.
The aim of the entire study is to take a snapshot of the current situation and assess the maturity of project managers and organisations with regard to the issue of resilience. In particular, discover and highlight which practices are already implemented by organisations and which are the most critical and difficult to manage.
The faculty of Innovative Technologies of the University of Applied Science of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), as a training and research Institute, will therefore be able on one hand to define courses or study programmes to fill these gaps; on the other hand, to continue to disseminate information and useful content on the subject in order to increase the awareness of organisations related to the importance of resilience in project management.
What is meant by resilience? The term comes from the Latin resilire (to leap backwards or bounce back) and refers to the ability of a system to return to its initial state after being subjected to an imbalance.
Depending on the context, resilience can be oriented towards the concept of prevention (protecting oneself from unexpected events) or as an emergency response action in the face of unexpected changes.
According to the Stockholm Resilience Centre, resilience is the ability of a system, be it an individual, a lake, a city or an economy, to cope with change and constantly adapt. Resilience occurs when nature or humans transform traumas such as a financial crisis into opportunities for renewal.
To be resilient therefore does not only mean to oppose adversity, but implies a positive dynamic, the ability to move forward, allowing the Re-building of an improved path or process to respond effectively to crises. So, organisational resilience, if properly represented, also offers companies the possibility of transforming an adverse event into a path of growth and learning.
Considering all the previous definitions and perspectives, the following definition of project resilience is the one considered most valid: it is the ability of the project system to be aware of its surroundings, its vulnerabilities, and the capacity to adapt to recover from disruptive events and achieve its objectives.
In a project lifecycle it is possible that several disruptive events happen, these can be known or unknown in the project phase. In this case, project management is under a lens that counts four main focuses: technology, people, behaviour, and organisation. This concept of multidimensional focus has been the subject of various research over time in many disciplines and domains. Those interested in exploring these themes further will find a wealth of perspectives across our project management blog.
The study starts with a structured online Google survey which was sent via email to a selected target working in companies located in Switzerland and Italy and operating in different sectors, whose size will range from small, mid-size to large, including both local and global organisations.
The study has been developed with the start of a survey in several languages.
The questionnaire has been structured with 27 questions divided into 5 main areas that cover the following main topics:
Referring to the identification area, the results show that among the companies surveyed, there is a majority of respondents from the respective sector that covered the 60% of the results: Healthcare, Building or Construction, Public Administration and Information and Communication Technology.
The vast majority of organisations that took part in the survey have a size of 1000 employees or more (large organisations) with the 55% of respondents. Data shows that the medium-large organisations are not the second biggest value, only the 5% of respondents fall into this category. The second major value are companies with a dimension with 51-250 employees (small-medium size) covered by the 22.50% of results.
As shown in the chart below the organisations with 1 to 50 employees represents the 17.50% of the respondents.
The most influential core business is the one that refers to an international scale of users with 52.50% of respondents. It can be noted that the National Scale and the Regional Scale are similar with 27.50% and 20% respectively of the respondents.
From the research emerges the distribution of companies by type of market: respectively 55% of the companies is definable as Business to Consumer (B2C) and 45% Business to Business (B2B).
Regarding the impact of project management inside the company, the 55% claims that the project management facilitates the business activities and have a high importance. A medium importance is ascertained from 25% of the respondents, while the 20% indicate a low influence of the project management on business activities.
The survey analysis shows that in the business context, resilience is not explicitly mentioned in relation to project management. Our sample tells us that more than 70% do not talk about resilience.
In light of this, it is therefore surprising to see that one out of two times when adverse events occur a corporate body is present to provide support to the project manager.
Specifically, 60 per cent of the time the support structure is the company’s general management. Only in the remaining 40% of the cases does the support come from the project manager’s office. It should also be noted that all respondents stated that they never use external consultants.
When asked whether “the company in which you work has introduced tools or activities to support cultural change in the organisation“, 7 out of 10 respondents stated that their company has introduced processes aimed at change.
In 42% of the answers it was indicated that the company has created a platform for digital communication, in 29% it has set up a training course to develop leadership and in 20% it has created a coaching course.
Next, the analysis investigates whether the company in which the respondent works has introduced tools or activities to support a new organisational model based on teamwork. In 70% of cases, the sample responded positively.
The most popular tool, with 37% of responses, was the digital collaboration platform, followed by training for project managers (28%), coaching (18%) and learning management systems (17%).
By carrying out a detailed analysis of the chart emerge a discomfort which will be created by a lack of leadership that leads to consequences in internal communication, in formulating and transmitting clear objectives.
This situation also generates an increase in business problems related to training with a low growth of targeted skills, the lack of adequate resources, unsuitable times and tools. A rigid company structure, the budget not in accordance with the needs and the continuous requests for the change that cause strong states of stress resulting in psychophysical sickness.
A step back to understand how the lack of certain aspects hinders the resilience of a company. With the reference to our graph we start to understand what are the causes and the effects when it comes to the communication.
We operate in a society in which the digitalisation and the adaptation of new technologies have triggered profound changes in the business dynamic. This element that was most affected is undoubtedly the internal communication with a serious of 90% of the gathered responses in the survey.
In a corporate organisational context, the role of internal communication is essential for the strategy, because the success and effectiveness of the projects and the following achievements of the objects is shared by the management which depends on it. Although communication is essential for the company, it is often underestimated and considered with insufficient awareness, this reaches so far that the complete communication is lacking. Therefore both the stability of the business climate and productivity and turnover are put to the test, with negative results towards the resilience of the organisation.
Another important aspect that must be considered as an obstacle to the resilience is the evident lack of leadership for about 87.5 % of the given responses. In fact the most important business goals for most executives around the world is to accelerate the pace of innovation to improve profitability and increase the market share. We can therefore define that the task of leadership has changed. Today´s leaders and executives have to deal with team management both in presence and remotely, these are the aspects which leads to greater difficulty by creating new leadership models and to stimulate the environment.
The problem that emerges from our survey is that at the top of companies there is a lack of “leaders of the future” capable of driving change within their organisation.
However, a careful distinction must be made between absent leadership, that is, lacking involvement with a team and, as in the concept of rent-seeking (taking value from an organisation without giving value). These absent leaders who offers too much freedom (laissez faire) without giving guidance and without taking responsibility for team decisions are a major problem for the company structure.
On the other hand if the leader or manager is not able to generate a healthy structure in terms of a
“great place to work” for the employees or has not the needed skills to give instructions and to guide, where you need courage, passion, confidence, commitment and ambition as well with a clear goal to be achieved it is a major problem for the company. It is needed to present a clear vision to be followed by the employees and a united vision and participation to achieve the ambitious goals.
This will be represented in our survey where we see clearly that the clarity of objectives takes place in 87.5% of the given responses. A group of people who don´t receive clear, transparent and achievable goals tend to fulfil their duties in a certain monotony, this leads to a massive lack of motivation with the risk of wasting time in activities which are not in favour of the goals which need to be achieved. Consequently, the quality of the daily work diminishes, and a gap is created between the top management and the subordinates. The single employee does not feel part of one ore more projects and does not know how to proceed in his work with consequent economic losses and corporate prestige in the market.
In our days we see more and more specialised people within the companies than in the past, which translates into greater value and at the same time a greater need to know the medium and long term objectives. The communication with situational awareness and strategy becomes essential, therefore it is of vital importance to set one or more objectives in a detailed path. It is important to reach a point of arrival that allows collaborators to advance with awareness, avoiding disorganisation and promoting business resilience. Developing the ability to define and control project scope is one practical way organisations can build this kind of structured clarity into their projects.
Another important topic to consider is related to the inadequacy of resources at 42.5% due to the lack of targeted skills and continuous internal/external training that we can see from the graph with a clear 47.5%. The current job market is becoming more and more dynamic, new professions are being born that become highly specialised, some technical skills became obsolete, this leads to a skill mismatch (mismatch of existing skills and skills requested by employers). This can cause situations in where the employee has to adapt to positions that are lower than his qualification, this leads to expenses for the companies, namely the training to close the skill gap (development of additional skills that will help the person to become more effective and qualified). Another possibility is to train the person to fulfil a different role within the company with a completely new training for employees with insufficient skills.
Another point we have to consider is the difficulty of companies linked to perception, which is the case if the companies do not have enough time to complete all work activities, this we identified with about 42.5% and is caused by the following factors:
However, there are techniques to optimise time management and to improve the quality of individual work, in addition to updating / purchasing means and devices that support the daily work of collaborators. Teams that invest in smart scheduling and strategic planning are far better positioned to overcome these time management obstacles and maintain momentum through disruption. Unfortunately, the rigid corporate structure experienced by 30% of the interviews turns out to be a reason why change management can encounter resistance to change and organisational resilience.
A correct calculation of the budget dedicated to a project is also an obstacle and there are two main reasons for it:
The fact that the budget is not adequate to the company/project needs is represented by 25% of the interviewed participants, in this case the company has a serious problem. For the company it is not acceptable to be halfway through the project and then to discover that there are not enough resources to support the achievements and the planned objectives, this has a destructive effect on the entire project and carries a high potential of frustration for all participants.
And finally, the survey shows that the continuous request for change is represented by 27.5% causes a strong possibility of stress which is represented by 42.5% and therefore psychophysical implications of the employees which comes up to 37.5%. This last condition gives rise to the increase in insurance and social health costs, the failure to meet deadlines, poor quality, no loyalty of employees, exhaustion of opportunities, lack of corporate maturity, this leads to a great obstacle for the company resilience. Structured learning in risk management can equip project managers with the practical tools needed to anticipate and address these compounding pressures.
In the following cluster, numerous critical factors were analysed including those that impact the development of resilience and how resilience can positively or negatively affect the different organisational activities in which the project manager is an integral part.
The human factor is intertwined with the need to develop adequate skills and is then declined in the various activities in which the resilience factor is “core”.
From the analysis emerges as central issue the “trust” element, expressed with the 37% (riferimento al grafico) : the Human factor is therefore critical for project manager team’s activity in order to carry out operational activities smoothly.
Thus, the winning triptych emerges: Trust, Responsibility and Motivation that support productivity.
The value of feedback is very important to the project manager as it allows him to know how other team members perceive his business: 19% need to adopt a fast workflow management skills. In this context, “agile” methodologies are borrowed for the elimination of unproductive touch points in favor of streamlining the work process with the release of cognitive resources.
The answers show an overwhelming predominance (75%) of the need for technological innovation as an enabling and facilitating factor for project management. Only 25% expressed a contrary opinion, not considering technological innovation as a facilitating factor in PM; this is probably to be found in the habit of adopting routine methods and tools and in the will not to face economic investments as well as not wanting to welcome a real radical change.
The answers received focus more on the adoption of collaborative digital platforms with a clear 45%. This confirms that, in the PM environment, the use of tools that allow team members to share contents and to be able to relate in real time by assigning tasks and receiving notifications is the indispensable element for a fluid and efficient workflow. On the other hand, 29% define as relevant the technical learning related to the skills needed to carry out the activities in a PM team.
There can be no resilience without a direct correlation with the “empathy” factor within the company organisation and its PM teams. The data shows that 63% of companies have already introduced activities to develop empathy between collaborating teams.
PM teams consist of and deal with multifunctional entities, making it necessary to train “empathy” so that there is harmony between the personal and professional characteristics of the members. Only 37% of the responding companies answered that they do not have any activities for the development of empathy, but this percentage is not considered relevant.
