All Courses
Upcoming Course Dates
Professional Courses
Academy & Short Courses
IPM Courses
PMI Courses
IPMA Courses
PRINCE2 Courses
Corporate Training
Corporate Partnership
Strategic Partnership
IPM Competency Pathway
Growth Partner
Certification Overview
IPMA Certification
PMI Certification
About IPM Hub
IPM Membership
EMEA Monthly Events
Mentorship
All Resources
Expert Insights
Ebooks & Toolkits
Publish Your Writing
IPM Jobs Portal
The Institute
Faculty
Global Advisory Board
Apply to Lecture or Volunteer
Apply to Intern or Campus Ambassador
Speak to an Advisor
hamburger__close
Project plans transform ideas into actionable roadmaps. Without proper planning, projects drift off course, waste resources, and miss deadlines. Research shows 37% of projects fail due to unclear objectives, whilst 47% miss targets because of poor requirements management.
Effective project planning addresses these risks by defining what you’ll deliver, how you’ll deliver it, who will do the work, and when each task must complete. This guide walks you through creating project plans that keep teams aligned, stakeholders informed, and projects on track.
Whether you’re managing your first project or refining your approach, these nine steps provide a practical framework for successful project delivery.
A project plan outlines how you’ll execute, monitor, and close a project. It defines what needs to happen, when it happens, who does it, and how you’ll measure success. Think of it as your project roadmap—a document that guides decision-making and keeps everyone aligned on priorities.
Every project plan includes three fundamental baselines. The scope baseline defines what you’ll deliver and what’s excluded. The schedule baseline establishes when tasks occur and when deliverables complete. The cost baseline sets the approved budget and spending authorisation.
Beyond these baselines, comprehensive project plans include subsidiary plans covering all project aspects. These address how you’ll manage scope, schedule, costs, quality, resources, communications, risks, procurement, and stakeholder engagement. Each subsidiary plan details specific processes, responsibilities, and success criteria for its domain.
Project plans vary based on size and complexity. Small initiatives might need just a timeline, budget, and responsibility matrix. Large programmes require detailed planning documents addressing quality standards, risk responses, procurement strategies, and change management processes.
The key is matching planning effort to project needs. Over-planning small projects wastes time. Under-planning complex initiatives creates confusion and increases failure risk. Experienced project managers calibrate planning depth based on project characteristics, organisational culture, and stakeholder requirements.
Effective project plans evolve throughout the project lifecycle. Initial plans capture best understanding at project start. As work progresses and teams learn more, plans require updates reflecting new information, changed circumstances, and refined understanding. Regular plan reviews ensure documentation remains current and useful.
Project plans provide structure in uncertain environments. When teams understand their objectives, tasks, and responsibilities, they work more efficiently and make better decisions. Plans serve multiple critical functions that directly impact project success.
Alignment and Direction
Plans ensure everyone understands project goals and their role in achieving them. This alignment prevents wasted effort on unnecessary work and reduces conflicts over priorities. Team members can answer “what should I work on next?” by referring to the plan rather than constantly seeking direction.
Resource Optimisation
Knowing what needs to happen when allows efficient resource allocation. You can identify when specialists are needed, order materials with appropriate lead times, and balance workload across team members. Without this visibility, resources sit idle whilst other tasks face bottlenecks.
Risk Management
Planning reveals potential problems before they occur. Mapping dependencies shows where delays might cascade. Estimating costs identifies budget risks. Evaluating requirements surfaces technical challenges. Early identification enables proactive problem-solving rather than reactive crisis management.
Stakeholder Communication
Plans provide stakeholders with visibility into project status and progress. Rather than constant status requests, stakeholders can review plans to understand timelines, upcoming milestones, and resource needs. This transparency builds confidence and reduces management overhead.
Performance Measurement
Plans establish baselines for measuring progress. Comparing actual performance against planned performance reveals whether projects are on track. This enables course corrections before small variances become major problems. Without baselines, teams lack objective criteria for assessing project health.
Creating project plans requires systematic thinking and stakeholder collaboration. These nine steps provide a structured approach to developing comprehensive project plans.
Start by understanding what stakeholders need and expect from the project. Conduct interviews with key stakeholders to learn their objectives, constraints, and success criteria. What problems does this project solve? What outcomes matter most? What concerns do stakeholders have?
Document these requirements clearly, distinguishing between mandatory needs and nice-to-have features. Validate your understanding by reviewing requirements with stakeholders before proceeding. Misunderstood requirements create rework and dissatisfaction later.
Different stakeholder groups often have conflicting requirements. Sales wants features quickly, finance wants cost control, operations wants reliability. Surface these conflicts early and work with sponsors to establish priorities. Clear prioritisation prevents constant re-negotiation during execution.
The scope statement establishes boundaries for your project. It describes what you’ll deliver, why the project exists, and what’s explicitly excluded. This clarity prevents scope creep—the gradual expansion of project work beyond original agreements.
Document your scope statement covering several key elements. Describe the business need driving the project and the problems you’re solving. List all deliverables you’ll produce, defining each clearly enough that stakeholders understand what to expect. Specify what’s excluded from scope to manage expectations and prevent assumptions.
Identify known constraints limiting your options. Budget caps, fixed deadlines, resource availability, and regulatory requirements all constrain how you deliver the project. Document constraints so planning accounts for them rather than treating them as surprises.
State your assumptions—conditions you believe are true but haven’t verified. Assuming key resources remain available, that vendors deliver on time, or that requirements won’t change significantly affects planning. Document assumptions so teams recognise when they prove false and require plan adjustments.
Break the project scope into manageable components using a work breakdown structure. This hierarchical decomposition divides deliverables into smaller work packages that teams can estimate, assign, and track effectively.
Start with major deliverables identified in your scope statement. Decompose each deliverable into smaller components until you reach work packages; pieces of work small enough to estimate accurately and assign to individuals or small teams. Work packages typically represent 8-80 hours of effort.
The work breakdown structure serves multiple purposes. It ensures you haven’t forgotten any required work. It facilitates resource planning by showing skill requirements. It enables progress tracking at appropriate detail levels. It forms the foundation for scheduling and cost estimation.
Involve team members in creating the work breakdown structure. They understand technical requirements better than project managers and can identify tasks that might otherwise be missed. Their involvement also builds commitment since they’re defining their own work rather than receiving assignments from above.
Convert work packages into specific tasks with clear start and end points. Then determine the order these tasks must occur based on dependencies and constraints.
Some tasks must complete before others can start. You can’t test software before writing it. You can’t install equipment before receiving it. These finish-to-start dependencies create sequences that constrain your schedule. Other tasks can run in parallel, allowing simultaneous progress on multiple fronts.
Map these relationships to identify your critical path; the sequence of tasks that directly determines project duration. If any critical path task delays, your entire project delays. Non-critical tasks have float—they can delay somewhat without impacting project completion.
Understanding dependencies and the critical path focuses attention on the right tasks. Teams prioritise critical path work and closely monitor it for delays. They also recognise when delays to non-critical tasks don’t require immediate intervention.
For each task, estimate how long it will take, what it will cost, and what resources you’ll need. These estimates form the basis for your project schedule and budget.
Duration estimates should reflect the actual work time required, not elapsed calendar time. A task requiring 16 hours of effort might span three days if the person works on other things simultaneously. Consider interruptions, meetings, and competing priorities when converting effort estimates to calendar duration.
Cost estimates include all expenses required to complete tasks. Labour costs, material purchases, equipment rentals, contractor fees, travel expenses, and contingency reserves all contribute to total project costs. Create estimates at the work package or task level, then roll them up to calculate total project costs.
Resource requirements specify what types of resources each task needs and when. Developers, designers, equipment, facilities, and materials all represent resources that must be available when tasks begin. Identifying resource needs early enables timely procurement and prevents delays caused by missing resources.
Use historical data from similar past projects to improve estimate accuracy. Consult with experienced team members who’ve done similar work before. Build contingency into estimates to account for uncertainty.
Clarify who will perform each task and what authority they have. This prevents confusion, ensures accountability, and empowers team members to make appropriate decisions.
Define the project manager’s role first. Typically this includes overall project planning, progress tracking, stakeholder communication, risk management, and issue resolution. The project manager coordinates work but doesn’t necessarily perform all tasks directly.
Identify other key roles required for your project. Technical specialists, business analysts, quality reviewers, and subject matter experts all contribute specific expertise. For each role, document responsibilities and decision-making authority to prevent overlapping duties or gaps.
Assign individuals to roles based on skills, availability, and development needs. Match task requirements to individual capabilities. Consider workload across the team to avoid overloading some members whilst others have capacity. Build in some redundancy so that work can continue when key people are unavailable.
Document these assignments in a responsibility matrix showing who is responsible for tasks, who must approve decisions, who should be consulted, and who needs to be informed. This clarity reduces constant questions about who should do what.
Identify potential problems that might impact your project, then develop strategies for addressing them. Proactive risk management prevents surprises and prepares teams to handle issues that do occur.
Start by brainstorming risks with your team and stakeholders. What might go wrong? Where are you uncertain? What assumptions might prove false? Consider technical risks, resource risks, schedule risks, and external risks from vendors, regulations, or market conditions.
Assess each risk’s likelihood and potential impact. High-probability, high-impact risks deserve immediate attention. Low-probability, low-impact risks might simply be accepted. Focus planning effort on risks that could seriously impact project success.
Develop response strategies for significant risks. Some risks can be avoided by changing the plan—using proven technology instead of bleeding-edge solutions, for example. Others can be mitigated through contingency plans or early warning systems. Some risks might transfer to others through insurance or contracts. Accept low-priority risks, documenting them so you’re not surprised if they occur.
Define how you’ll keep stakeholders informed throughout the project. Effective communication prevents misunderstandings, maintains stakeholder confidence, and enables quick decision-making when needed.
Identify all stakeholder groups requiring project information. Executives need high-level progress summaries. Team members need detailed task information. Customers need deliverable status. Different audiences require different information at different frequencies.
For each stakeholder group, specify what information they need, how often they need it, in what format, and through which channels. Weekly status reports, monthly steering committee meetings, daily team stand-ups, and project dashboards all serve different communication needs.
Establish escalation paths for issues requiring decisions beyond the project manager’s authority. When should issues elevate to sponsors? What information do decision-makers need? How quickly must decisions occur? Clear escalation processes prevent delays whilst ensuring appropriate governance.
Document these communication requirements so team members know their reporting responsibilities and stakeholders know what to expect. Review and adjust communication plans as projects progress and needs evolve.
Integrate all planning components into a cohesive project management plan. This includes your scope, schedule, and cost baselines along with all subsidiary plans covering quality, resources, communications, risks, procurement, and stakeholder engagement.
Review the integrated plan with key stakeholders to ensure it meets their needs and expectations. Verify that the schedule achieves required deadlines, the budget fits within constraints, and the approach addresses all requirements. Resolve any concerns before proceeding.
Once stakeholders approve the plan, baseline it. The baseline becomes your reference point for measuring progress and managing changes. Actual performance gets compared to baseline performance to identify variances requiring attention.
Establish change control processes before starting work. How will you evaluate requested changes? Who has authority to approve changes? How will approved changes get incorporated into baselines? Strong change control prevents scope creep whilst allowing necessary adjustments.
Distribute the plan to all team members and stakeholders. Ensure everyone can access the information they need to perform their roles effectively. Consider using project management software to make plans easily accessible and current.
Even experienced project managers make planning errors that impact project success. Recognising these common mistakes helps you avoid them.
Insufficient Stakeholder Input
Plans created in isolation miss critical requirements and perspectives. Involve key stakeholders throughout planning to understand their needs, constraints, and concerns. Their input improves plan quality and builds commitment to execution. Stakeholders support plans they helped create and resist plans imposed upon them.
Overly Optimistic Estimates
Tasks consistently take longer and cost more than initial estimates suggest. Build contingency into plans to account for this reality. Use historical data from similar past projects to improve estimate accuracy. Consult experienced team members rather than guessing at durations and costs. Better to deliver early than constantly explain delays.
Ignoring Dependencies Between Tasks
Task dependencies create scheduling constraints that planning must respect. You can’t complete dependent tasks until predecessor tasks finish. Failing to map these relationships creates unrealistic schedules that immediately prove unworkable. Take time to understand dependencies so schedules reflect actual constraints.
Inadequate Risk Planning
Every project faces risks that might impact success. Identifying potential problems early enables proactive mitigation rather than reactive crisis management. Teams that skip risk planning find themselves constantly surprised by predictable problems. Spend time thinking about what might go wrong so you can prevent or prepare for likely issues.
One-Time Planning Instead of Continuous Updates
Project plans should evolve as teams learn more about requirements, constraints, and solutions. Initial plans capture best understanding at project start, but understanding improves during execution. Update plans regularly to reflect current reality rather than outdated assumptions. Treat plans as living documents, not static artefacts.
Various tools support different aspects of project planning. Choosing appropriate tools depends on project complexity, team size, and organisational requirements.
Gantt Charts
Gantt charts display schedules visually, showing tasks, durations, and dependencies on a timeline. They make it easy to see which tasks run in parallel, identify the critical path, and spot scheduling conflicts. Most project management software includes Gantt chart capabilities. They work well for projects with clear task sequences and moderate complexity.
Work Breakdown Structures
Work breakdown structure diagrams hierarchically organise project work into manageable components. They ensure comprehensive scope coverage and facilitate resource planning and cost estimation. Simple projects might use basic outlines, whilst complex programmes benefit from detailed multi-level breakdowns. Mind mapping tools and project management software both support work breakdown structure creation.
Responsibility Matrices
RACI matrices clarify roles by showing who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed for each task or decision. They prevent confusion over responsibilities and ensure appropriate stakeholder involvement. Spreadsheets or simple tables work fine for documenting these assignments.
Project Management Software
Dedicated project management tools like Microsoft Project, Smartsheet, or cloud-based platforms integrate multiple planning functions. They support scheduling, resource allocation, cost tracking, and progress monitoring in unified environments. These tools work best for projects requiring detailed planning and regular updates.
Choose tools matching your needs. Small, simple projects don’t require sophisticated software. Large, complex programmes benefit from comprehensive project management platforms. Focus on using tools effectively rather than adopting every available feature.
A project charter authorises the project and appoints the project manager. It typically includes high-level objectives, scope, and key stakeholders. The project plan details how you’ll execute the work to achieve charter objectives. Think of the charter as permission to start planning, and the plan as your roadmap for delivery.
Detail level depends on project complexity, team experience, and stakeholder needs. Simple projects with experienced teams might need just key milestones, responsibilities, and budget allocations. Complex projects with multiple dependencies, external vendors, or regulatory requirements need comprehensive planning across all knowledge areas. Match planning effort to project risk.
Update plans whenever significant changes occur. Scope adjustments, resource changes, major risks materialising, or shifted priorities all warrant plan updates. Many projects benefit from regular plan reviews at key milestones even without major changes. These reviews ensure documentation remains current and useful rather than becoming outdated artefacts.
First, understand why. Was the estimate wrong? Did unexpected problems occur? Are resources unavailable? The cause determines the appropriate response. Sometimes you can adjust the schedule, bring in additional resources, or reduce scope. Other times you need to inform stakeholders of revised timelines and manage their expectations.
Create plans addressing your project’s specific needs. Small projects don’t require eleven separate planning documents. They might integrate scope, schedule, and resource planning into a single concise plan. Larger projects benefit from detailed subsidiary plans that different specialists can own and maintain. Focus on useful planning, not documentation for its own sake.
Explain how planning reduces overall project time by preventing rework, misunderstandings, and resource conflicts. Share examples of projects that failed due to inadequate planning. Offer to create a lightweight plan that provides necessary structure without excessive documentation. Sometimes demonstrating planning value through quick wins convinces sceptical stakeholders.
Agile approaches still require planning, but use different timeframes and levels of detail. Rather than planning entire projects upfront, Agile teams plan in short iterations, adjusting based on learning. The question isn’t whether to plan, but how far ahead to plan. Choose approaches matching your project’s level of uncertainty and change.
Requirements changes during planning suggest stakeholders don’t fully understand what they need. This is common and actually better discovered during planning than during execution. Continue refining requirements through prototypes, mockups, or iterative reviews until stakeholders achieve clarity. Budget time for this discovery process rather than forcing premature planning.
